Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to footer

Indictment Count Eight 8 — For Racketeer-Larceny- Accessory After The Fact -Bribery — Twenty-Three Counts 23

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE – PUBLIC RECORDS

Grand Jury Deliberations — Grand Juror Number SCLGJ________

 

Regarding Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-PDS

 

 

Indictment Count Eight 8 — For Racketeer-Larceny- Accessory After The Fact -Bribery — Twenty-Three Counts 23

 

 

“01-31-2019 Unlawful Final Judgment Of Foreclosure”

 

A.   On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, dba Defacto Judge in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Martin County, Florida, unlawfully produced for Public Records, for Public Trial, Case Number: 43-2018-CA-000371, the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” therefore stole the home of the victims Donald Schiavone and Patricia Dye Schiavone, by an unlawful “Bench Trial” which breached “Federal Constitution” “Bill Of Rights And Bill Of Prohibitions” Amendment VII [7] Title: “Trial By Jury”, home stole for the violators Bruce Andrew Williams, ET AL, and others, dba New Penn Financial, LLC aka Shellpoint Mortgage, dba Nationstar Mortgage LLC, which is also subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank N.A., and for the reason that the home has been stolen by unlawful misleading forgery “Shellpoint Mortgage Loan ID Number: 0578500190”, wherefore William Loy Roby, ET AL, acting by “Barratry” which is the crime committed by a judge who receives a bribe for his judgment, and acting as a lawyer, which is prohibited by Federal Law USC28 § 454, breached multiple “Rule Of Law” Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” “Common Law” Amendment VII [7], USC28 §§ 44, 453, 454, 455, 1746, USC18 §§ 2, 3, 201, 242, 494, 872, 1001, 1621, 1622, 1623. 1951 1962,1963, Fl St. 113.071. 

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

WHEREFORE: 

 

 

 

B.   Indictment Count Eight [8] Fraud And False Statements Count One [1] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, dba Defacto Judge in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Martin County, Florida, unlawfully produced for Public Records, for Public Trial, Case Number: 43-2018-CA-000371, the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 1 of 5 unlawfully misleading declared: “Case Number: 43-2018-CA-000371” as a result, the document may not be shown in the established Case Number: 2018-CA-000371, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” Federal Law” “Common Law” USC18 § 1001 Title: Fraud And False Statements.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Trial By Jury Count Two [2] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, dba Defacto Judge in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Martin County, Florida, unlawfully produced for Public Records, for Public Trial, the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 1 of 5 unlawful misleading the Title declared: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” and for the reason that on 01-23-2019, Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, dba God Grace Administrator for Florida Statewide Common Law Grand Jury, filed document Title: 01-23-2019 Demand To Provide Oath Of Office And Surety Bond, page one [1] declared: “We The People” do ordain and establish to our “Civil Servants” within the Constitution for the united States of America. Bill of Prohibitions Amendment VII [7] “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” As a result William Loy Roby, ET AL, presiding by “Trial By Bench” decided unlawfully the cause on his own, and the victims Donald Schiavone, and Patricia Dye Schiavone, or the Twenty-Five [25]  Common Law Grand Jurors of their Peers, aka “The Sureties For The Peace” were not legally convoked and sworn, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” “Common Law” Amendment VII [7] Title: Trial By Jury.    

   

01-23-2019-Demand-To-Provide-filed-

 

(2)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Perjury Count Three To Six [3-6] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 1 of 5 unlawful misleading, title:
“It Is Ordered And Adjudged 1. Title: Final Judgment” declared: “There is no dispute of material facts and Plaintiffs is entitled to entry of final judgment”, and for the reason that multiple facts were disputed as “Forgery Redacted and “Blocked Out the Lawful Note Number: 648918797” which unlawfully was forged by the repugnant “Loan Number: 0631399060” therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” Title: Perjury. USC18 §§ 1001, 1621, 1622, and 1623.  

(3)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Theft, Robbery, Larceny Count Seven [7] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 2 of 5 ordered 3. Title: Amounts Due, declared: “Plaintiff, New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage located at 55 Beattie Place, Suite 100, Greenville, SC 20601, is due: Principal”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” Title: Racketeering. USC18 § 1951.

(4)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Extortion Count Eight [8] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 2 of 5 ordered 3. Title: Principal, declared: “Interest on the note and mortgage from May1, 2017 to January 31, 2019”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” Title: Extortion. USC18 § 872.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

(5)   Indictment Count Eight [8] RICO Count Nine [9] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 2 of 5 ordered 3. Title: Grand Total, declared: “$143,648.83”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” Title: Racketeer, Influenced, and Corrupt, Organized, aka RICO. USC18 §§ 1961-1962.

(6)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Bad Behavior Count Ten [10] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 3 of 5 ordered 6. Title: Sale of Property, declared: “…, the Clerk of the Court shall sell the subject property at public sale on March 7, 2019”, and for the reason that is not the duty of the judge to sell property, and instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule “Circuit judges shall hold office during good behavior”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 44 Subsection (b) Title: Appointment, Tenure, Residency, And Salary Of Circuit Judges.

(7)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Residency Count Eleven [11] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 3 of 5 ordered 7. Title: Costs, declared: “Plaintiff shall advance all subsequent cost of this action…”and for the reason that is not the duty of the judge to set rules of cost, instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “Circuit judges shall hold office during good behavior”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 44 Subsection (c) Title: Appointment, Tenure, Residency, And Salary Of Circuit Judges.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

(8)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Oath Count Twelve [12] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 3 of 5 ordered 8. Title: Distribution of Proceeds, declared: “On filling the Certificate Of Title, the clerk shall distribute the proceeds of the sale”, and for the reason that is not the duty of the judge to set any rules, instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “I, William Loy Roby, swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as judge under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 453 Title: Oath of Justices and Judges. 

(9)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Practice Of Law Count Thirteen [13] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 3 of 5 ordered 9. Title: Right of Redemption, declared: “ On filling of the Certificate of Sale,”  and for the reason that is not the duty of the judge to set any rules, instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a high misdemeanor”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 454 Title: Practice Of Law By Justices And Judges. 

(10)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Disqualification Of Judge Count Fourteen [14] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 3 of 5 ordered 10. Title: Right of Possession, declared: “ Upon filling of the Certificate of Title,”  and for the reason that is not the duty of the judge to set any rules, instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which .. is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 455 Title: Disqualification of Justice, Judge or Magistrate Judge.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

(11)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Sureties Count Fifteen [15] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 4 of 5 ordered 11. Title: Jurisdiction Retained, declared: “The Court specifically reserves jurisdiction to enter further orders”, for the reason that the judge has no jurisdiction according to the rules of the “Common Law” “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” “Florida Statutes” instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “The sureties upon the official bonds of all state, officers, shall have sufficient visible property unencumbered within the state, not exempt from sale under legal process, to make good their bonds”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” Florida Statute § 113.071 Title: Sureties Upon Official Bonds.

(12)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Sureties Count Sixteen To Eighteen [16-18] William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 4 of 5 ordered 11. Title: Jurisdiction Retained, declared: “If this Property is sold”, “If you are the Property Owner”, “If you decide to sell” for the reason that the judge has no jurisdiction according to the rules of the “Common Law” “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” “Florida Statutes” instead of deciding the cause based on facts, in contrast finding perjury, which was maliciously ignored with bad behavior, contradicted the rule: “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which … is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 455 Title: Disqualification of Justice, Judge or Magistrate Judge.

(13)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Perjury Count Nineteen [19] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” on page 5 of 5  declared: “Ordered at Martin County, Florida on January 31 2019 Circuit Court Judge” with no name, which is perjury, “Rule Of Law” “Common Law” “Federal Law” which obliged: “Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, …in writing of such person which is subscribed by him”, therefore is perjury for unsworn declarations, breached “Rule Of Law” Federal Law” “Common Law” USC28 § 1746.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

(14)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Bill Of Attainder Count Twenty [20] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” and for the reason that is without trial by jury, or final judgment of foreclosure with no due process of law, not based on facts, which is  prohibited in the “Federal Constitution” crime title: “Bill Of Attainder,” therefore breached  “Rule Of Law” “Common Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” Article I [1] Section 9 Title: “Bill Of Attainder”.

(15)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Bill Of Attainder Count Twenty-One [21] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure” and for the reason that is without trial by jury, or final judgment of foreclosure with no due process of law, not based on facts, which is  prohibited in the “Federal Constitution” crime title: “Bill Of Attainder,” therefore breached  “Rule Of Law” “Common Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” Article I [1] Section 10 Title: “Bill Of Attainder”.

(16)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Accessory After The Fact Count Twenty-Two [22] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure”, William Loy Roby, ET AL know or should know that Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, dba God Grace Administrator for Florida Statewide Common Law Grand Jury, demanded “Trial By Jury” according to the rules of the “Common Law” ordered by “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Federal Constitution” Amendment VII [7] Title: Trial By Jury, and the undeniable evidence, the truth, the fact, the absolute, for the “Forgery Crime” by the repugnant “Promissory Note” attached in the repugnant Plaintiff Complaint, for the reason that Albertelli Law, representing Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper, dba New Penn Financial LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, and dba Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. unlawfully redacted “Blocked Out the Lawful Note Number: 648918797”, which is recorded for Public Trial, Public Record, filed with document Title: “01-23-2019 Demand To Provide Oath Of Office And Surety Bond” wherefore William Loy Roby, ET AL breached “Rule Of Law” Federal Law” “Common Law” USC18 § 3 Title: Accessory After  The Fact.

 

01-31-2019-Judgment-s-

 

(17)  Indictment Count Eight [8] Bribery Count Twenty-Three [23] On 01-31-2019 at 11:50 AM, William Loy Roby, ET AL, produced the repugnant order Title: “Final Judgment Of Foreclosure”, on page 2 of 5 ordered 3. Title: Court Costs, declared: “Filling Fee $961.00, Service Of Process $ 770.80, Notice Of Action Publication $170.00, Title Update $60.00”, therefore breached “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” USC18 § 201 Title: Bribery.

(18)   Indictment Count Eight [8] Fact On 01-23-2019, Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, dba God Grace Administrator for Florida Statewide Common Law Grand Jury, in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Martin County, Florida, for Public Records, for Public Trial, Case Number: 2018-CA-000371 filed document Title: 01-23-2019 Demand To Provide Oath Of Office And Surety Bond, page 1 declared: “We The People” do ordain and establish to our “Civil Servants” within the Constitution for the united States of America. Bill of Prohibitions Amendment VII [7] “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

 

01-23-2019-Demand-To-Provide-filed-

 

 

Indictment Count Eight 8 – Redress Of Grievances For Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-PDS

 

SCLGJ-Verdict-Count-8-r-

 

DEFINITIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rule Of Law — Common Law — Federal Law — Federal Constitution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Department Of Justice Logo in Latin declared: “Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur” therefore the translation in English: “Whos  Profession Dominate Justice Follows” wherefore: The first One To Follow The “Rule Of Law” Is Whosoever Work In The Department Of Justice.