Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to footer

Cases

SCLGJ Case Number: 20210604-DTAWND-GC-SHC; Common Law Victim Shawna Cox

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE — PUBLIC RECORDS

 

02-15-2022 You Provoke God To Anger!

This video is about “To Do Not Surrender Our Constitutional Rights”, is about Deprivation of our Constitutional Rights, is not about a “Traffic Case”, is about the “Will Of God”, for the “Honor Of God”, for the “Glory Of God”, for the “Honor Of Our Predecessors”, for the “Honor Of Our Generation”, and for the “Honor Of Our Posterity”.

 

 

Violators Surety Bond Information

Violators-Garfield-County-Utah-Case-Number-21500690-

Common Law STEP 6

UTAH SCLGJ Will Demand To Insurance Carrier For: Government Crime Policy “Enforcement”.

  1. Utah Statewide Common Law Grand Jury will contact Insurance Carrier for: Government Crime Policy; According to the Rules Of The Common Law, FederalLaw, USC18 § 2071 Subsections (a) and (b) Violators shall forfeit Office.

Common Law STEP 5

Statewide Common Law Grand Jury Will Publicly And Formally Made The Accusation Title: “Indictment”

 

Common Law STEP 4

 Judgment By Default, Nihil Dicit; He/She Says Nothing”

  1. Federal Law, Common Law, Supreme Law Of The Land, “Forever In It’s  Entirety”, also known as “United States Constitution, Bill Of Rights, And Bill Of Prohibitions, Amendment Seventh [7th] demand to the violators: “If you do not file and serve your “VERIFIED ANSWER” by the dead line 03-27-2022, “Offenses Are Admitted When Not Denied” consequently THE RULE OF LAW strictly demands judgment by default  which is “Nihil Dicit; He/She Says Nothing”. See page Two [2] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Five [5] of the Common Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  2. On 03-27-2022, if you do not file and serve your “VERIFIED ANSWER” by the deadline, “affirmations are admitted when not denied”, consequently default judgment applies. With Indictment you will be formally accused by THE UTAH STATEWIDE COMMON LAW GRAND JURY for all Fifty-Eight [58] offenses [pages Three [3] to Eleven [11] committed in the complaint, and the default judgment means the victim party can get what they asked for, and you do not get the chance to tell your side of the story to the “Sureties For The Peace” “The Twenty-Five Grand Jurors” THE UTAH STATEWIDE COMMON LAW GRAND JURY. See page Two [2] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Five [5] of the Common Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.

Common Law STEP 3

 “Defendants Shall Enjoy Day In Court; Defendants Have Forty [40] Days To Rebut The Fifty-Eight [58] Offenses. 

  1. Defendants “VERIFIED ANSWER” under penalty of perjury, in writing, with certify court documents, will be publish in this forum, immediately after the documents are properly filed in the UTAH SCLGJ for Public Due Diligence and for  Public Trial. See See page One [1] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Two [2] of the Common Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  2. Federal Law, Common Law, Supreme Law Of The Land, “Forever In It’s  Entirety”, also known as “United States Constitution, Bill Of Rights, And Bill Of Prohibitions, Amendment Fifth [5th] demand to the violators to file the obligatory “VERIFIED ANSWER” to the “Presentment filed by Utah Statewide Common Law Grand Jury. See page One [1] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] One [1] of the Common Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  3.  Federal Law, Common Law, Supreme Law Of The Land, “Forever In It’s  Entirety”, also known as “Magna Carta” Clause Sixty-One [61] demand to the violators to rebut the Fifty-Eight [58] offenses, by filing the “VERIFIED ANSWER” under penalty of perjury, in writing, with certify court documents, and the “Last Day” to rebut in this case is 03-27-2022. See page One [1] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] One [1] of the Common Law Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  4.  Federal Law, Common Law, Supreme Law Of The Land, “Forever In It’s  Entirety”, also known as “Magna Carta” Clause Sixty-One [61] demand to the violators to rebut the Fifty-Eight [58] offenses, in Forty [40] days due on 03-27-2022, thereafter your null and void “Verified Answer” one day late is 03-28-2022. See page One [1] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Three [3] of the Common Law Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.

Common Law STEP 2

Statewide Common Law Grand Jury Files Common Law Suit Title: “Presentment Of Joint Summons”

  1. SCLGJ Administrator instruct to the Victim to Verify under penalty of perjury, and sign in front of the Notary the Presentment Of Joint Summons. See page Twelve [12] of Thirteen [13] of the Common Law Suit Document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  2. SCLGJ Administrator attach the document title: “Demand To Amend With No Delay” to the Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”. See Exhibit Twenty-Three [23] page Three [3] of Nine [9] of the Common Law Suit Document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  3. SCLGJ Administrator instruct to the Victim to Certify under penalty of perjury that all defendants are served with copies of the Law Suit. See page Thirteen [13] of Thirteen [13] of the Common Law Suit Document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  4. SCLGJ Administrator instruct to the Victim to “Hold The Fifth [5th] Amendment of the United States Constitution; Only The SCLGJ confront the violators, not the victim.  See Exhibit Twenty-Three Cover page One [1] of Nine [9] of the Common Law Suit Document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  5. Statewide Common Law Grand Jury instruct to the violators to do not communicate with the victim, under penalty of USC18 § 1513 Title: “Retaliating”, which fined each violator not more than  $250,000, under this title or Twenty [20] years imprisoned, or both. See page One [1]of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Two [2] of the Common Law Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  6. SCLGJ Administrator file under penalty of perjury the “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons” in the  “Court Case”. The Victim is instructed by the SCLGJ, to file two [2] copies of this document in his/her “Court Case”, and to receive back one copy sealed with “Dated, filed or “Received” by the court; See page One [1]of Thirteen [13] of the Common Law Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.
  7. Federal Law, Common Law also known as “Magna Carta” Clause 61 grant to the violators Forty [40] days to rebut the offenses, under penalty of perjury, in writing, with certify court documents, and Last day to rebut in this case is 03-27-2022. See page One [1] of Thirteen [13] Paragraph [¶] Three [3] of the Common Law Law Suit document Title: “02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons”.

 

02-15-2022 Presentment Of Joint Summons

02-15-2022-Presentment-Of-Joint-Summons-filed-

 

Exhibits 22 and 23

Exhibit-22-23-s-

Exhibits 24, 25, 26, and 27

Exhibits-24-25-26-27-

 

Exhibits 28 and 29

Exhibit-28-29-

 

Common Law STEP 1

Recording Affidavit For Perpetual Evidence

  1. Victim file under penalty of perjury the “Demand To Amend With No Delay” also known as “DTAWND”. See Affidavit page number Six [6] of Seven [7].
  2. SCLGJ Administrator examine “Undeniable Evidences” and produced with Victim the affidavit. See “Undeniable Evidences” Exhibits one [1] to Twenty-One [21].
  3. SCLGJ Administrator instruct the Victim to file “Affidavit” with Exhibits, in the Office of the Recorder. See 06-04-2021 Affidavit Entry No. 00193104 Book 0560 Page 0504  Forty-Two Pages Fee $40.00.
  4. SCLGJ Administrator instruct the Victim to file “Recorded Affidavit” in the “Court Case”. See 06-04-2021 Affidavit Cover Page Title: 06-04-2021 I Hold The Fifth Amendment.  

06-04-2021 Affidavit

06-04-2021-Affidavit-p1-

 

Exhibits 1 to 10

 

Exhibits-1-to-10-

 

Exhibits 10 to 21

 

Exhibits-11-to-21-

 

More Information Coming Soon

Please share!

SCLGJ Case Number 20181018-DTAWND-DLK-BMK Common Law Victim David Lee-Bernita Margaret Kleensang

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE — PUBLIC RECORDS

 

On 06-07-2012 Julie Ann Krotz, dba repugnant, extremely distasteful; unacceptable racketeering, Sheridan County Clerk Magistrate and Associate Judge, stole the Kleensang Ranch, stole the Kleensang Equipment, stole the Kleensang Brand, for Linda Sue Smith Et Al, dba repugnant thieving swine, extremely distasteful; unacceptable racketeering gangster. 

06-07-2012-To-Julie-Krotz-

08-15-2021 David Lee Kleensang Summary SCLGJ Case

This video is about Larceny, Theft, Racketeering, Perjury, Fraud, and other multiple crimes by Defacto Officers in Nebraska.

 

 

 

 

Regarding Case Number: 20181018-DTAWND-DLK-BMK

SUMMARY

A.   On 08-08-2001 at 9:00 AM, a verified instrument, public record in Book 110 of Deeds, Page 295 Title: Last Will and Testament of Betty A. Kleensang, under penalty of perjury, GRANTED REAL ESTATE PROPERTY by Virgil F. Kleensang and Betty A. Kleensang husband and wife to their son, David Lee Kleensang, Grantee, and his descendants; Bernita Margaret Kleensang; Becky Jean Kleensang; Candace Marie Kleensang; and Colby James Kleensang.

This INDEFEASIBLE CONTRACT Title: Last Will and Testament of Betty A. Kleensang, wherein all taxes were paid, was to be returned to the producers of the instrument, the Law firm: Crites, Shaffer, & Connealy, PO Box 1070, Chadron, NE 69337.

B.   On 04-26-2006, Paul D. Empson, dba Defacto Judge, helped by the unlawful “Inefficient Assistance Of Counsel” repugnantly ordered: “Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, both parties waive jury trial in this matter”, which breached multiple “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” “Federal Constitution” “Bill Of Rights and Bill Of Prohibitions” Amendment V [5], VI [6], VII [7] “Trial By Jury”, USC 28 §§ 44, 453, 454, 455, 1746, USC 18 §§ 2, 3, 43, 201, 241, 242, 494, 872, 1001, 1512, 1513, 1621, 1622, 1623, 1951, 1961, 1962, 1963, 2071 (a) (b).

C.   On 10-24-2007, David Lee Kleensang, dba as Sovereign, directed letter respectfully, to Brian Charles Silverman, dba Defacto Judge in the District Court Of Sheridan County Nebraska, for the Case Number: CI-04-76, declared: “This letter is to reinforce the fact that I (David Lee: Kleensang) am sovereign and you (Judge Brian Silverman) are a public servant. I consider your oath of office as a binding contract between you and me; that you will preserve and protect my rights.”

D.   On 01-25-2008, Brian Charles Silverman, dba Defacto Judge, helped by the unlawful “Inefficient Assistance Of Counsel” repugnantly ordered: “The court finds that all Motions for summary judgment should be granted and Plaintiff is to prepare Decree of foreclosure”, which breached multiple “Rule Of Law” “Federal Law” “Common Law” “Federal Constitution” “Bill Of Rights and Bill Of Prohibitions” Amendment V [5], VI [6], VII [7] “Trial By Jury”, USC 28 §§ 44, 453, 454, 455, 1746, USC 18 §§ 2, 3, 43, 201, 241, 242, 494, 872, 1001, 1512, 1513, 1621, 1622, 1623, 1951, 1961, 1962, 1963, 2071 (a) (b).

E.   On 07-29-2010, a REPUGNANT CONTRACT Title: Last Will and Testament of Virgil F. Kleensang unlawfully, by racketeering, NOT RECORDED, was produced by Randy D. Cullers BAR # 20972; Crites; Shaffer; Connealy, Watson & Patras, PC, LLO; located in the same address [See Above Second Paragraph] 201 E. Third St., PO Box 1070, Chadron, NE 60337; which is the same law firm that prepared the INDEFEASIBLE CONTRACT Title: Last Will and Testament of Betty A. Kleensang.

F.   On 11-29-2011 at 11:35 AM, David Lee Kleensang and Bernita Margaret Kleensang, Lien Claimants, notified 23 Lien Debtors, giving them 30 days to reply under oath, under penalty of perjury, the verified instrument number: 2011— 01369 of deeds Title: “Amended Affidavit of Heir ship Commercial Lien (This is a verified plain statement of fact)”. Among the Debtors notified were the Law firm Crites, Shaffer, Connealy & Watson LLC; Randy Cullers; Virgil F. Kleensang, Et al.

G.   On 05-10-2012, which is 40 days after the death of Virgil F. Kleensang, the REPUGNANT CONTRACT Title: Last Will and Testament of Virgil F. Kleensang; unlawfully, by racketeering, perjury, larceny, theft, was recorded for the public record.

H.   On 06-13-2012, David Lee Kleensang and Bernita Margaret Kleensang were KIDNAPPED for the unlawful, not “under penalty of perjury” claim of Conspiracy, coercion, for filing and recording the verified instrument, number: 2011— 01369 of deeds Title: “Amended Affidavit of Heir ship Commercial Lien (This is a verified plain statement of fact)” filed and recorded on 11-29-2011 at 11:35 AM. 

I.   On 09-12-2012, Laurie Smith Camp, dba Defacto Chief Judge in the United States District Court, District Of Nebraska, unlawfully, and repugnantly, sentenced David Lee Kleensang to Fourteen Years [14] 14 years of incarceration.

J.   On 09-12-2012, Laurie Smith Camp, dba Defacto Chief Judge in the United States District Court, District Of Nebraska, unlawfully, and repugnantly, sentenced Bernita Margaret Kleensang to Eleven Years [11] 11 years of incarceration. At sentencing, Laurie Smith Camp declared to Bernita Margaret Kleensang: “I’m going to make an example out of you and your religious cult”.

K.   On 08-17-2013, Brian Charles Silverman, dba Defacto Judge, in the District Court Of Sheridan County Nebraska, died at Medical Center on Saturday at age 66.

L.   On 12-05-2014, Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, dba God Grace Administrator for Nebraska Statewide Common Law Grand Jury, filed document title: “Indictment For Racketeering” Ten Counts, against Laurie Smith Camp, ET AL., which was directed to Stacia A. Hilton, dba United States Marshal Services Director, for Public Record, Public Trial, for Immediate Press Release. Public link Website: 

http://www.wethepeoplecommonlawgrandjury.com/file/12_05_2014_Indictment_For_Racketeering_10_Counts.html

M.   On 08-31-2020, Bernita Margaret Kleensang was released by the kidnappers, after Eight Years [8] Two Months [2] and Eighteen Days [18] of being unlawfully incarcerated.

On 10-06-2020, David Lee Kleensang, was released by the kidnappers, after Eight Years [8] Three Months [3] and Twenty-Four Days [24] of being unlawfully incarcerated. See Exhibit 7.

     

N.   On 10-18-2020, Paul D. Empson, dba Defacto Judge, in the District Court Of Sheridan County Nebraska, died at his home early Sunday morning at age 79.

O.   On 10-23-2020, Laurie Smith Camp, dba Defacto Chief Judge in the United States District Court, District Of Nebraska, died unexpectedly overnight at age 66.

P.   On 10-24-2020, Benjamin Eric Sasse, dba Defacto Senator for Nebraska, unlawfully, Misleading, breached “Federal Law” USC18§ 1001  when released this false statement: “Judge Smith Camp was a smart, well-respected jurist who committed her life to serving her community and upholding the rule of law. She served her community for years and was a n impeccable jurist who paved the way for women in the legal field in Nebraska. Melissa and I mourn her death. We pray tonight for her family and loved ones.”

COMPLAINT

 

READ MORE

SCLGJ Case Number: 20190131-DTAWND-RBD – Common Law Victim Rodger Birtwell Dowdell

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE – PUBLIC RECORDS

09-05-2020 Dr. Carrie Madej Urgent Information on COVID-19 

 

 

03-10-2021 OBJECTION TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL ZOOM HEARING, FOR UNLAWFUL SUMMARY FINAL JUDGMENT.

 

03-10-2021 Objection To Unlawful Zoom Hearing filed zoom=

 

01-06-2021 Order Of Disqualification

 

06-06-2021 Order Of Disqualification zoom=

 

 

SUMMARY

A.   On 09-12-2012, Laurie Smith Camp, dba Defacto Chief Judge in the United States District Court, District Of Nebraska, unlawfully, and repugnantly, sentenced Bernita Margaret Kleensang to Eleven Years [11] 11 years of incarceration. At sentencing, Laurie Smith Camp declared to Bernita Margaret Kleensang: “I’m going to make an example out of you and your religious cult”.

B.   On 08-31-2020, Bernita Margaret Kleensang was released by the kidnappers, after Eight Years [8] Two Months [2] and Eighteen Days [18] of being unlawfully incarcerated.

C.   On 10-23-2020, Laurie Smith Camp, dba Defacto Chief Judge in the United States District Court, District Of Nebraska, died unexpectedly overnight at age 66.

D.   On 10-24-2020, Benjamin Eric Sasse, dba Defacto Senator for Nebraska, unlawfully, misleading, released this statement: “Judge Smith Camp was smart, well-respected jurist who committed her life to serving her community for years and was an impeccable jurist who paved the way in the legal field in Nebraska. Melissa and I mourn her death. We pray tonight for her family and loved ones.”

READ MORE Regarding Case Number: 20181018-DTAWND-DLK-BMK

 

 

 

 

 

 

06-22-2020 Rodger Birtwell Dowdell Case In A Nutshell

 

Regarding Case Number: 20190131-DTAWND-RBD

 

COMPLAINT

A.  University Park, Florida – Local homeowners of Manatee County are being extorted through the creation of the University Park Recreational District (UPRD). Developer, John A. Neal, Et Al., proposed the creation of the new district to the Manatee County Board of County Commissioners (MBoCC) and they subsequently approved it. This was done unlawfully for profit, benefiting the developers, attorneys, and county commissioners.

READ MORE

Please share!

SCLGJ Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-PDS-Common Law Victim Patricia Dye Schiavone

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE — PUBLIC RECORDS

09-05-2020 Dr. Carrie Madej Urgent Information on COVID-19 

 

 

 

07-22-2020 Patricia Dye Schiavone Common Law Case In A Nutshell

 

07-22-2020 Patricia Dye Schiavone Common Law Case In A Nutshell, is the Introduction for the Common Law Case about Patricia Dye Schiavone dba Teacher, Mother, Victim who strived to achieve justice since 2016 or attain justice in the face of difficulty or resistance by organized conspiracy white-collar crime, relating to the work done by those who work in an office or other professional environment, racketeering, Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organized aka RICO, by which these white-collar racketeering violators, and by larceny which is the felonious taking the property of another, without his consent and against his will, with intent to convert it to the use of the taker, consequently professional larcenous criminals, abusing the influence work of office, stole Patricia Dye Schiavone home, appraised in the unlawful website seller zillow.com in the amount of $439,000.

Regarding Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-PDS

 

COMPLAINT

READ MORE

Please share!

SCLGJ Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-DS; Common Law Victim Don Schiavone

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE — PUBLIC RECORDS 

 

 

 

07-22-2020  Don Schiavone Common Law Case In A Nutshell

 

07-22-2020 Don Schiavone Common Law Case In A Nutshell, is the Introduction for the Common Law Case about  Don Schiavone dba Fisherman, Father, Victim who strived to achieve justice since 2016 or attain justice in the face of difficulty or resistance by organized conspiracy white-collar crime, relating to the work done by those who work in an office or other professional environment, racketeering, Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organized aka RICO, by which these white-collar racketeering violators, and by larceny which is the felonious taking the property of another, without his consent and against his will, with intent to convert it to the use of the taker, consequently professional larcenous criminals, abusing the influence work of office, stole  Don Schiavone’s home, appraised in the unlawful website seller zillow.com in the amount of $439,000.

Regarding Case Number: 20190123-DTAWND-DS

 

COMPLAINT

A.   On 05-11-2005 at 11:12 AM, Patricia Dye Schiavone dba Teacher, Mother, Victim, in which as victim, purchased her home, signed the Promissory Note Number: 648918797.

05-12-2005 Promissory Note Number: 648918797

05-12-2005-Note-

 

READ MORE

Please share!